您現在的位置 » 首頁 » 政治 » » 商品評論


商品評論: 風和日暖──台灣外省人與國家認同的轉變

風和日暖──台灣外省人與國家認同的轉變
日期: 2020 三月 04 週三
評論者: 訪客

評論:
We'll need to take up references http://xnxx-xnxx.site/sawira-name-meaning-in-urdu/ amshentai The statement from Lionsgate is nice, but the premiere reads beyond hand-wavey to me. Whatever any one person chooses to do is their business, and I don’t have a problem with what anyone decides re: seeing the film. Benefits are nice, though I hope they don’t affiliate with HRC because that’s a whole other kettle of problematic fish, and I’d like to see money going to something like Lambda Legal which is doing the actual legal work to fight what NOM is doing, but I don’t want anyone thinking this makes things okay. Any money Card receives from paid work is still being tithed to the CoLDS (which also funded Prop 8) and being put into NOM. Residuals, back-end points, etc., put money in his pockets. To me, that’s a problem. If the perception is that the film is being let off the hook of Card’s utter failure at humanity allows people to stop thinking about how they consume media, then we’re back to square one. My hope for this entire situation is not that EG will fail at the box office, (I don’t know that the general public is aware enough for that) but that perhaps we can look at the ethical considerations of our media consumption. I don’t require the art I love to be made by good people, that’s an irrational expectation of life. Card may be a perfectly nice person to the people around him, make art that people love which does no harm to anyone, and still be incredibly dangerous to our society because he has the money and authority to pursue a bigoted agenda and make it stick. If we don’t question our consumption of media in the face of his actions, when will we?


評等: 4 顆星!

 

上一項
放到購物籃

 


copyright 2005 Twe-commerce